Five Rivers timeline extension

Sunday's Oshkosh Northwestern editorial suggested the council vote Tuesday to extend the timeline for the proposed Five Rivers project. The editorial board suggested the city give the developer, Tom Doig, "every chance to succeed" with the project. I agree, however, believe that's what we've already done.

If you remember back to the council meeting when the first term sheet was approved, I "enthusiastically" supported the proposal. I believed then - and still do - that a development such as this will serve as a catalyst for future progress. It's a win-win situation. There comes a times, however, when either the project moves forward or the city moves on. I believe the later is where we are now, and it's time for a "Plan B."

I agree that a three month timeline extension, at face value, does not seem unreasonable. And I'm not opposed to giving the city and potential developers the necessary time and means possible to bring forth a development such as Five Rivers. I am, however, only willing to go along when I believe in the viability of the project and the people involved.

Unfortunately, the ongoing negotiations with Mr. Doig and his team leave me very unsatisfied, and I am no longer convinced this project with this team is best for Oshkosh. That is why I plan to vote against the timeline extension, and also why I plan to ask city staff to proceed immediately with a new request for proposals (RFP).

There are a lot of talented individuals with excellent ideas who could help us with the opportunity to reclaim our riverfront. Our community, this council and the city staff have already demonstrated the desire and willingness to work with those who have ideas for our great city. That's a positive step in the right direction. We must learn from this experience, apply it to the next and move forward.

-Bryan