I've already been asked why I voted against Mayor Castle's
resolution to place a referendum question on the November ballot asking the citizens of Oshkosh to allow the city to exceed the state imposed levy freeze. Below are the reasons why I did not support the resolution.
1) I did not agree with the statement, "[t]he Council hereby
supports (emphasis added) an increase in the city tax levy for 2006..." Just because a council places an item on the ballot does not mean they support it. That language should not have been included.
2) I am uncomfortable with the statement, "[t]he Council directs that the question of increasing the city tax levy for 2006 (to be collected in 2007)
by (emphasis added) 9.5096 percentage..." To me, this resolution says the council is going to raise the levy by that amount. Along with that, City Attorney Kraft read the ballot language at the meeting last night - talk about confusing!
3) Similar to the reason above, it was discussed that the council would most likely not need the entire levy increase - then why ask for that much? We should have had a more specific number and clearly stated what we intended to do with it (similar to recent area school district referendums).
4) Finally, I'm not at all satisfied with where we are regarding the budget process. The only cuts mentioned by City Manager Wollangk were service cuts. No administrative cuts and no new ideas. I understand cuts will be made, but not all service-oriented. The council asked for an earlier and better budget process this year. It's good that we started earlier, however, it's now clear that the process also needs to be changed.
I encourage anyone with questions or concerns regarding my vote to
contact me directly. Thank you.
-Bryan
P.S. I will continue to use this blog and my
website to maintain an open dialogue as we work through the budget process. As I did last year, I will be creating a special budget page on my website complete with links to important documents, and it will also have a comment section.