Follow up
I first would like to apologize for not posting or responding for the past two weeks. I intentionally took some time away from the blogs after the campaign, but failed to mention that I would be doing so. In turn, I have been accused of not following through on being an effective communicator and listener, something in which I take great pride. I am, however, back to reading, replying and posting on a regular basis.
The 2% hotel/motel increase
The Oshkosh Convention and Visitors Bureau (OCVB) worked with city staff to bring forward a resolution to increase the hotel/motel tax by 2%, which was approved on a 4-0-2 vote. There has been quite a bit of discussion and confusion about how this will work.
As explained in the resolution, during the council meeting and at the previously televised council workshop, the first 2% will be used to pay the city's debt service on the current convention center. The next 1% will go directly to the OCVB (our designated tourism entity). The final 7% will be divided up between the city, OCVB and the Grand Opera House Foundation.
The 2% increase is being used for the bond payment. The original 8% will be used to pay for the convention center operations, funding for the Grand Opera House and OCVB, who plans to use some of their funds to create a development fund, similar to the Fox Cities Convention and Visitors Bureau, to help projects that would promote tourism.
I supported the increase, but was advised by the City Attorney that I needed to abstain from the vote since I am employed by the university, who is one of the potential benefactors of the OCVB development fund matching grant. I did, however, successfully amend the proposal to have a sunset clause; the tax will revert back to the original 8% upon successful repayment of the convention center bonds.
Nuisance Ordinance
The nuisance ordinance proposal, which was approved on a 4-2 vote, will only strengthen our neighborhoods. The common misconception with this ordinance is that property owners will be held financially liable for the actions of their tenants. This is not true. A property owner would only be fined under this ordinance if he or she refuses to cooperate with the city once he or she has been properly notified of a nuisance.
I supported this proposal because it gives the community and the city another tool in developing strong, quality neighborhoods. I believe 99% of property owners will not be impacted by this ordinance change. Who will be impacted? The absentee-landlord who simply refuses to take responsibility for his or her property.
Crime in Oshkosh
The new council meets for the first time Tuesday, April 17th, and this will be one of the topics on our agenda. When crime rates went down in the 1990's, it was because we had a strong economy - people had good paying jobs and education was more affordable. That is why it would be a mistake for us to look at this problem with only one solution. We will need to address issues such as jobs, the economy, education, social and human services, law enforcement, housing, poverty, etc. This will be one of the most important issues the council will tackle this year.
I believe that should catch me up on recent discussions. As always, I welcome your feedback and discussions. And I look forward to again serving on your council for the next two years.
-Bryan
The 2% hotel/motel increase
The Oshkosh Convention and Visitors Bureau (OCVB) worked with city staff to bring forward a resolution to increase the hotel/motel tax by 2%, which was approved on a 4-0-2 vote. There has been quite a bit of discussion and confusion about how this will work.
As explained in the resolution, during the council meeting and at the previously televised council workshop, the first 2% will be used to pay the city's debt service on the current convention center. The next 1% will go directly to the OCVB (our designated tourism entity). The final 7% will be divided up between the city, OCVB and the Grand Opera House Foundation.
The 2% increase is being used for the bond payment. The original 8% will be used to pay for the convention center operations, funding for the Grand Opera House and OCVB, who plans to use some of their funds to create a development fund, similar to the Fox Cities Convention and Visitors Bureau, to help projects that would promote tourism.
I supported the increase, but was advised by the City Attorney that I needed to abstain from the vote since I am employed by the university, who is one of the potential benefactors of the OCVB development fund matching grant. I did, however, successfully amend the proposal to have a sunset clause; the tax will revert back to the original 8% upon successful repayment of the convention center bonds.
Nuisance Ordinance
The nuisance ordinance proposal, which was approved on a 4-2 vote, will only strengthen our neighborhoods. The common misconception with this ordinance is that property owners will be held financially liable for the actions of their tenants. This is not true. A property owner would only be fined under this ordinance if he or she refuses to cooperate with the city once he or she has been properly notified of a nuisance.
I supported this proposal because it gives the community and the city another tool in developing strong, quality neighborhoods. I believe 99% of property owners will not be impacted by this ordinance change. Who will be impacted? The absentee-landlord who simply refuses to take responsibility for his or her property.
Crime in Oshkosh
The new council meets for the first time Tuesday, April 17th, and this will be one of the topics on our agenda. When crime rates went down in the 1990's, it was because we had a strong economy - people had good paying jobs and education was more affordable. That is why it would be a mistake for us to look at this problem with only one solution. We will need to address issues such as jobs, the economy, education, social and human services, law enforcement, housing, poverty, etc. This will be one of the most important issues the council will tackle this year.
I believe that should catch me up on recent discussions. As always, I welcome your feedback and discussions. And I look forward to again serving on your council for the next two years.
-Bryan
18 Comments:
From the Tony P. blog:
"As for the city manager's goals, there seemed to be great resistance offered from the returning members of the council (Bain, Esslinger, McHugh, B. Tower) to any discussion of the goals that might even imply a public performance evaluation of the manager."
OK here's breaking news-
The public DOES HAVE a performance evaluation perception of the manager, and its not positive!
You guys are the people we elected. Step up and FIX THE PROBLEM!
By Anonymous, at April 18, 2007 8:48 AM
This may be a CLOSED subject until
next year.
The council had several closed sessions with discussions regarding the City Manager preformance, goals, evalution, etc.
They did their evaluation and decided to grant Mr Wollangk a 1% raise. That closes the door until next year.
Mr. Bain explained to council candidates by state law a "public" review of the City Managers evaluation can not be done.
It's a personnel issue. Every working person has a personnel record that is OFF LIMITS to the public. Returning members of the council are aware of these laws and will have to educate the new-comers. The resistance is probably due to state laws.
By Anonymous, at April 18, 2007 5:39 PM
Discussing the goals is not the same as a performance evaluation. The returning council members need to find a backbone. Of particular disappointment was Paul Esslinger. He has complained about accountability for as long as we can remember but wouldn't even support discussing the goals in public. What a hypocrite. But this is a man newcomer Palmeri wanted for deputy mayor? Wow!
By Anonymous, at April 18, 2007 7:25 PM
I don't understand why you are getting so bent out of shape regarding the goals for the City Manager.
No one questioned the BOE setting goals for the Superintendent of schools. Have you seen a list of his goals posted anywhere?
No one questioned the BOE spending extra dollars for an outside consultant to evaluate Superintendent,instead of doing the evaluation themselves.
We should praise the past and returning members of our city council for their willingness to spend all the extra hours for the process and for setting forth the goals they have brought forward.
Let's start looking at the positives that are happening within the city and get over the plot against the city manager!
By Anonymous, at April 19, 2007 6:34 PM
But no one has been complaining about the performance of the school superintendent either. All we have heard for the last 2 years or better from citizens and council members alike, as well as the media, have been complaints about the city manager and a lack of accountability. Now suddenly these council members develop no spine and cold feet. Not a good combination, especially for those who will be needing to run for reelection in '08.
By Anonymous, at April 20, 2007 8:01 AM
"But no one has been complaining about the performance of the school superintendent either..."
I agree with this statement. Our school administration and many on the board appear to be quite inept, yet they continue to fly under the radar of public opinion.
Why do we keep giving this group of jugheads a collective pass?
By Anonymous, at April 20, 2007 12:30 PM
But no one has been complaining about the performance of the school superintendent either.
WHY NOT?
How many years has he worked for the OASD?
When did we start having maintainence issues with the schools?
How many new staff positions has he approved since coming on board?
New staff, new programs, with no way to fund them and no one is screaming foul....
I realize life is not always fair but shouldn't taxpayers judge both of these public figures in the same light?
Which budget is asking for a $46M referendum to bale out bad decision making?
By Anonymous, at April 20, 2007 1:36 PM
So if it's so awful, where have you been all this time?
By Anonymous, at April 20, 2007 4:18 PM
Gotta love the way the amount keeps jumping up. The district hasn't even announced a figure but the naysayers keep increasing the figure. So much for their credibility. INcredible is more their speed.
By Anonymous, at April 20, 2007 4:20 PM
If some of you people are so eager to spend money, please feel free to stop at 215 Church Ave or the School Office on Eagle and feel free to make a nice donation. Mr. H. and Mr. W. will be glad to relieve you of any money you wish to contribute.
By Anonymous, at April 20, 2007 8:17 PM
We have been here and we have been complaining!
Trying to get people to listen gets us called names. We are "Naysayers" or NIMBY's.
It is much easier for some people to call names than face the true issues.
Some of us started complaining when some of the BOE racked up expense accounts to travel to hire this the new " Super" We complained about the salarys offered and program cuts.
We tried to get citizens to realize the results of hiring and outside company to take care of the maintainence of our schools.
Sooner or later we realize its easier to give up than to beat your head against the wall.
If someone gives you advice and you choose not to take it all that is left is to close and simply tell you...... WE TOLD YOU SO!
By Anonymous, at April 22, 2007 1:32 PM
Maybe it's that most of us just don't think the things you're complaining about are really that big a deal. If they were, you'd see elections going in a different direction. Negativity breeds negativity. But if you still believe there's a problem and you don't like being called a naysayer, try constructive criticism. You might have more luck winning people to your side.
By Anonymous, at April 23, 2007 11:11 AM
constructive criticism??
Tell me how constructive criticism works...
when gold plated toilets are okay..
when political leaders vote for
fancy more expensive lighting over a bridge but consider it okay to turn off lights in other parts of a city..
when councilor feel its okay to raise a tax 2% to fund "pet projects" and drives potential business away from Oshkosh..
Look at the WANTS fueled by political desires rather than the NEEDS of a community.
By Anonymous, at April 24, 2007 9:53 AM
I think it's more about quality of life than politicla desires and funding pet projects. Clearly some of you will never see that, nor appreciate it. As has already been stated the voters don't seem bothered by the things you see as issues. Until you can pursuade us with something more than rhetoric, you will be viewed as a naysayer.
By Anonymous, at April 24, 2007 10:00 AM
Quality of life issues??
these offer different options for anyone.. some of us would just like to be able to make ends meet!
What good are all the fancy Leach theaters,or Grands, muesums or concerts if only outsiders can enjoy them and the neighbors have to endure violations to city noise and public drunken ordinances?
What good are the parks if the streets leading to them are in dire repair?
What good are any of the quality of life issues when we have murderers and thiefs or a police department that won't control speed limits or enforce the simple ordinances of youth smoking, disorderly conduct or vandalism within city parks.
By Anonymous, at April 25, 2007 8:34 AM
spoken like a true visionary
By Anonymous, at April 25, 2007 3:21 PM
Good converstion on another blog site...
What was left out of this story was a comment that Tony Palmeri made: "This economic development commission needs to have a member or members who are from organized labor." In other words, he wants union members on an economic development commission.
Had this been an "are you in favor of" question prior to the election, and Mr Palmeri had said yes, he would be in favor of it, he would have lost the election by a landslide. Tony, are you crazy? If you had a business that you wanted to relocate, and in your first meeting with a potential city you were greeted by a commission containing a union member, you would RUN RUN AWAY from this city as fast as you could. Some companies that are looking to relocate are doing it because they are trying to get away from an existing union. And if you didn't have a union, why in gods name would you want to move to a city that appears to promote them? NO profitable, growing business wants anything to do with a union environment. Period.
Tony, you were elected to work for the good of Oshkosh. In your first regular meeting, you bring up one of your personal, left wing agenda items. It would be OK if it was a good idea, but this one stinks! Shame on you! Get back to working for the good of Oshkosh. BTW, these types of things are what have kept you from getting elected to higher offices in the past.
REPLY...
Interesting theory - except for some facts. Tony has always been pro-labor, and he made that clear during the election. After all, he was the President of TAUWP (The Association of University of Wisconsin Professionals). Labor is not exactly a "left wing agenda" - Labor works to bring better standards of living to people who do the work be it public employees or private employees. Tony probably got elected BECAUSE of his strong labor positions.
Tony campaigned on "living wage standards" for Oshkosh, and that is why it would be good to have Labor representation on an Economic Development Commission. The last thing Oshkosh needs is more minimum wage no benefits service sector jobs. No one can live on that other than teenagers and a handful of college students. Oshkosh needs good paying jobs that can support families.
If some businesses are going to "run run away from this city" because labor is at the table of economic development than good ridance. Oshkosh needs businesses that are going to support good jobs. The last thing we need are more wal-mart level jobs that keep people living at the poverty line and sucking tax payer money through badger care.
All this is very interesting in that the only Unions that are growing and thriving are Public Sector Unions.
Private sector unions have been on the decline for many years now.
Corporations will not do business with the extraordinary wage and benefit demands made by unions.
Public sector unions only succeed as there are arbitration and quid pro quo laws. These laws protect union members often at the expense of the average property tax payer.
A private sector union member may to receive a wage increase as healthcare cost increases keep rising where as public sector unions often get cost of living wage increases along with 95% taxpayer funded healthcare.
Our system needs changing. One segment of our labor system should not be insulated from the realities faced by other laborers in the private sector union or non-union.
By Anonymous, at April 30, 2007 10:53 AM
The major cause of crime in Oshkosh is a result of the prisons. One has only to observe when the timing of when they were instituted and crime instinsified. Families of inmates arrived along with their friends in time. It isn't long before the word gets out that welfare is easy to get and live on in Oshkosh. After all, the welfare buck goes a lot further in Oshkosh than Milwaukee. Unfortunately when inmates are released they are not required to go back to where they came from. This is why we need a new Police Chief from outside (i.e. Racine) and more "diversified" police due to the profiling issue brought forward by the late Dr. Kenneth Viste. As a result of the Dr.'s political reform, now police must tip toe around certain minorities. Is it profiling or probability? This is a no brainer folks, some are treated with more "caution" than others and that is not fair.
By Anonymous, at June 04, 2007 3:11 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home